At least a third of my time at Allvoices has been spent writing summaries of developing news stories. Over the course of the last 6 months, I completed over 130 such pieces.
I wrote Italy to Fingerprint Gypsy Population last Thursday afternoon. It’s a good example of how I write these kinds of analyses when I feel as though I have a little more room than usual to editorialize.
Along the same lines, I wrote a series of reflections on Etgar Keret and Shira Geffen's 2007 film Jellyfish, which appeared in Zeek today. Nonsensically titled Netanya Fish Fry, the piece addresses recent American attempts to come to grips with contemporary Israeli cinema, and a tendency I detect to try and de-politicize it. Contending that recent narrative experimentation in Israeli filmmaking is in fact it's own political gesture, the article is about Diaspora anxieties about Israel, displaced onto film criticism.
It was an event that held a little significance for everyone. For Israelis, because of the commitment that the US President reiterated to their security. For Americans, because of the opportunity that their leader took to excoriate their country’s opposition in a foreign parliament. And, for Iran, which was once again reminded that, despite how poorly the US is faring in Iraq and Afghanistan, America would still protect Israel from any manner of threat. In other words, it was an exercise in consistency, one that Prime Minister Ehud Olmert duly noted by nearly falling asleep during the President’s speech in Jerusalem on Thursday.
Notwithstanding the umbrage taken by the US press to Bush’s address to the Knesset, for anyone familiar with the importance that the Republicans have attached to securing Jewish votes in the forthcoming elections, it all made sense. Of course the President would take advantage of such an ideal opportunity. The problem is that, aside from the advantages that Israel most definitely accrued from playing host to the occasion, it had less to do with Israel than it did with the United States, and the failings of the present administration to make any positive achievements in the Middle East during Bush’s two terms in office. With the failure of Lebanon’s government to contain Hezbollah, one cannot ask for a more timely display designed for domestic consumption during an election year.
As the United States slowly loses Lebanon to Iran, despite the immense investment the Americans made in the Siniora government, once again we have another example of how US intervention in the region has worsened Israel’s security. Sandwiched in between an Iranian-supported state in the south, and not one, but now two in the north, Israel’s situation, at the end of Bush’s final term in office, is actually worse than it was on 9/11. No wonder Israelis would want the kind of dramatic security guarantees that the US President has offered. No wonder they’d want it specifically from Bush, and that Israel would place so much value on it, too. Given how poorly the Israel Defense Forces have performed in recent years, the need for American reassurance, of the kind that the President reiterated, is that much more important. Its a horrible situation.
Yet, there is also good reason to argue that Thursday’s event in Jerusalem had little to do with reaffirming the significance of Israel’s security, however flawed America’s conception of it might be. Bush’s speech, as an editorial in Friday’s Haaretz suggested, also signaled the President’s willingness to use Israel’s conflict with Iran as a way of maintaining control over US Mideast policy after leaving office. To implicate Israeli security requirements with such a possible maneuver can only serve to further damage Israel’s long-term interests, not simply because precedent suggests that the US would lose such an engagement against the Iranians. But, as important, because it would implicate Israel’s security interests in contravention of America’s electoral process.
Americans may not have a clear idea of an effective Mideast policy alternative to that of Bush. Though the Democrats have not exactly offered any compelling options, the amount of energy that Republicans have expended trying to debunk Obama’s alleged positions suggests that conservatives fear another emerging policy is surely out there, and that it really is different. For as nebulous as that position might be, the desire for such a policy change is an enormous part of what will motivate millions of Americans to vote Democratic in November’s Presidential election. As the Bush administration’s failures in the Middle East have repeatedly demonstrated, that’s exactly why Israel ought to remain open to whatever alternatives an Obama-led government might have to offer.
Originally published on Allvoices
Sometimes, a ten minute walk from home can lead to more pleasant associations.
If you live in the US and need to follow events in the Middle East closely, Mosaic is absolutely indispensable. A thirty-minute long aggregation of regional television news programming broadcast on Link TV, the show is the brainchild of award-winning producer Jamal Dajani.
A Jerusalem native, and a resident of the San Francisco Bay Area, I spoke to Dajani about his work on Mosaic for the March issue of Zeek. What transpires is a fascinating conversation about the state of Middle Eastern media today, and its increasing importance for Americans.
If you enjoy this piece, check out Covering the Coverage, and Left of the Middle East. Short excerpts from my book, they cover much of the same topical ground as my conversation with Dajani, but focus on US and otherwise progressive Western news media instead.
It was a hard decision to make, but I had to do so. For the last twelve months, I desisted from doing any freelance work in order to reserve all of my energies for Israel vs Utopia.
Now that the book is in my editors’ hands, today, my first article since last March was published by Zeek. And, on Tuesday, I conducted my first formal interview since I spoke to Jimmy Carter in December 2006.
Look forward to reading a conversation about Middle Eastern news media with Link TV‘s Jamal Dajani in Zeek next month. To call it informative would be an understatement.
It’s just about out, and the first reviews for Righteous Indignation: A Jewish Call for Justice, are starting to filter through.
Edited by my former Tikkun colleagues Jo Ellen Green Kaiser and Or Rose, and the Kavod House’s Margie Klein, this inspired collection, documenting the new American Jewish social justice movement, is already receiving the recognition that it deserves. According to this week’s edition of Publisher’s Weekly,
While written for progressive Jews and their communities, anyone
struggling with the age-old conundrum of "…but what can I do?" should
sample this wonderful buffet of ideas, replete not just with tradition,
but with innovative interpretations suited to a 21st-century approach
toward social action and reform.
A slimmed down version of "Everything Falls Apart", the first chapter from my forthcoming book, Israel vs Utopia, has a home in Righteous Indignation‘s Israel section. A representative excerpt, The New Jewish Left, was posted to Mashdown last July.
On Friday morning, at 10 AM Pacific time, together with National Public Radio Iraq correspondent Deborah Amos, and Anna Badheken of The Boston Globe, I’ll be a guest on Your Call, hosted by San Francisco NPR affiliate KALW, 91.7 FM.
Covering everything from Middle Eastern media coverage of the recently released National Intelligence Estimate to Iraqi refugees, the Russian elections and Mitt Romney’s bid to capture the Republican Presidential nomination, it should be an interesting conversation.
If you’re outside the US and want to listen to the show, click here to subscribe to the podcast.
Speaking of Al Jazeera English, if you get the chance, check out Roger Cohen‘s excellent op-ed on the Qatari broadcaster in today’s New York Times.
Discussing the difficulties that the service has had trying to find national distribution from America’s cable and satellite providers, the Times‘ International-Writer-at-Large extols the network’s virtues, noting, in reference to the same polarized context invoked in Friday‘s posting, that Al Jazeera is carried (by Yes) in Israel, where it replaced the BBC last winter.
Incidentally (and much discussed as of late) Al Jazeera English was also slated to replace CNN on Israel’s largest cable service, Hot, but was outbid at the last minute by Fox News.
Copyright © 2004–2009. All rights reserved.
This blog is proudly powered by Wordpress and uses Modern Clix, a theme by Rodrigo Galindez. Implemented by Mike Lee.
